Library Databases vs Google
- Reliability
- Anyone can publish their ideas on the internet
- Information might be out of date since there are no formal reviews in place
- Information found through Google or other search engines is not evaluated for accuracy
- Information found in library databases is preferred because:
- Information is written and reviewed by experts
- Information is evaluated for accuracy and reliability
- Recommended by librarians and faculty
- Relevance
- Google or other search engines turn up lots of results but have very little to do with your search
- Google lacks filters
- Library databases are preferred because:
- You have more control over your search, since filters such as date ranges, languages, and peer reviewed can be applied
- UNC's library databases are grouped in subjects making it easier to find the appropriate information
- Permanence
- In ​Google or other search engines content can change or disappear all together
- Therefore it can not be archived and makes it impossible to verify your information
- Library databases are preferred because:
- Library databases provide published information that doesn't change over time
- This information will remain in the databases so that you will have access over a long time and scholars are able to verify your work
Source: https://bethelks.libguides.com/c.php?g=11565&p=61196, Evaluating Internet-Based Information: Library databases vs. search engines, from Bethel College Library.