To write in plain language means to use the simplest, most straightforward way of expressing an idea. Doing so will ensure your audience understands it the first time they read or hear it. Materials are in plain language if your audience can:
The following are resources and tools that can help you develop or assess patient materials so that they adhere to plain language principles.
The Program for Readability In Science & Medicine (PRISM) was inspired by health literacy concerns in health care and health research. PRISM’s goal is to bring readability awareness and plain language training and tools to researchers nationwide. Using plain language is a proven way to help make scientific and medical information easier for study participants, patients, and the public to understand.
The Plain Language Medical Dictionary widget is a project of the University of Michigan Taubman Health Sciences Library as part of the Michigan Health Literacy Awareness project.
Everyday Words for Public Health Communication offers expert recommendations from CDC's Health Literacy Council and other agency communicators on how to reduce jargon and improve reader understanding. You can search for public health jargon or plain language words and find alternatives and example sentences.
The Plain Language Action and Information Network (PLAIN) is a group of federal employees from different agencies and specialties who support the use of clear communication in government writing. Their guide, "Design for reading," can help you use design elements to help users read and understand the information.
The Clinical Research Glossary offers easy to understand clinical research definitions. All definitions are are developed by the Multi-regional Clinical Trials (MRCT) Center of Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard, and a team of patient advocates and other health professionals. This glossary is helpful to patients considering participating in clinical trials or those developing clinical trial participation materials.
A systematic method to evaluate and compare the understandability and actionability of patient education materials. It is designed as a guide to help determine whether patients will be able to understand and act on information. Separate tools are available for use with print and audiovisual materials.
The CDC Clear Communication Index (Index) is a research-based tool to help you develop and assess public communication materials.
This workbook was created by the National Cancer Institute to help you select and communicate quantitative data in ways lay audiences can understand.
Designing for reading is an important part of developing effective communications. Writing that is legible and well-organized is far easier to understand than more traditional styles. Even with regulations and the limits of publishing in the Code of Federal Regulations, you can use design elements to help users read and understand the information.
The goal of the organization is to promote the use of plain language for all government communications. They believe that using plain language will save federal agencies time and money and provide better service to the American public.
This guide, Clear & Simple, is designed to assist health communicators in developing audience-appropriate information and communicating effectively with people with low-literacy skills. It outlines a process—five standard steps—for developing health information materials. Planning questions are included for each step.
The Toolkit for Making Written Material Clear and Effective is a health literacy resource from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). This 11-part Toolkit provides a detailed and comprehensive set of tools to help you make written material in printed formats easier for people to read, understand, and use.
This document from the American Cancer Society provides language guidelines about subjects related to health equity including social determinants of health, shifting to person-centered language, race, ethnicity, and national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, and disability status. It includes introductions to each topic as well as terminology to avoid and suggested replacements, real-life examples, and references for further reading.
This glossary of terms compiled by the American Psychological Association cover topics of equity and power, person-first and identity-first language, identity-related terms, culturally appropriative and pejorative language, violent language, and language that doesn't say what we mean.
This guide from Oregon Health & Science University Center for Diversity and Inclusion provides instruction on understanding and using inclusive language in writing, teaching, and conversation.
This guide from the CDC covers best practices for inclusive public health communication including using a health equity lens, key principles, preferred terms, developing inclusive communications, inclusive images, and resources and references.
This guide from the UNC Health Sciences Library includes "support resources for patients, information about LGBTQIA+ health disparities, tools for doing research on LGBTQIA+ health, and educational resources for health professionals."
This guide from the UNC Health Sciences Library "contains health resources for Hispanic and Latino/Latina/Latinx individuals and their healthcare providers. Topics include:
This site brings together health literacy studies’ information including information on vocabulary and sentence structure, the reading process, as well as layout and design elements for health materials. Links on the page also include an overview, research findings, strategies and tools, and policies, reports, and initiatives.
Available in Doak & Doak (1996), Chapter 4, p.49
SAM, the Suitability Assessment of Materials instrument offers a systematic method to objectively assess the suitability of health information materials for a particular audience in a short time. It guides you to rate materials on factors that affect readability and comprehension. SAM rates materials in six areas: content, literacy demand, graphics, layout and type, learning stimulation & motivation, and cultural appropriateness.
This tool from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality provides an overview and specific actions for practices to be able to assess, select, and create easy-to-understand materials including training staff, working with your patients to evaluate forms and other written materials, and tracking your progress in ensuring your practice is communicating clearly with patients and their families.
Readability calculators take a sample of your writing and calculate the number of sentences, words, syllables, and characters. They are helpful when deciding if your writing is at the appropriate level for your intended audience. Below are a selection of commonly used readability calculators when assessing health literacy levels.
The formula is used in business, industry and government as well as education, to score materials from the upper elementary level through the secondary grades and beyond. The formula takes into consideration (1) the total number of words, and (2) the number syllables, and (3) the total number of sentences. It is one of the most popular and heavily tested formulas.
Calculates reading difficulty level by the average number of sentences and syllables per hundred words. These averages are plotted onto a specific graph; the intersection of the average number of sentences and the average number of syllables determines the reading level of the content.
Measures readability that estimates the years of education needed to understand a piece of writing.