Scoping Reviews: Home
Created by Health Science Librarians
New Guide Message
What is a Scoping Review?
What is a Scoping Review?
You should conduct a scoping review if you want:
-
To examine the extent, range and nature of research activity
-
To determine the value of undertaking a full systematic review
-
To summarise and disseminate research findings
-
To identify research gaps in the existing literature³
There are many types of literature reviews.
Before beginning a scoping review, consider whether it is the best type of review for your question, goals, and resources. The table below compares a few different types of reviews to help you decide which is best for you.
| Systematic Review | Scoping Review | Systematized Review |
|---|---|---|
| Conducted for Publication | Conducted for Publication | Conducted for Assignment, Thesis, or (Possibly) Publication |
| Protocol Required | Protocol Required | No Protocol Required |
| Focused Research Question | Broad Research Question | Either |
| Focused Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria | Broad Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria | Either |
| Requires Large Team | Requires Small Team | Usually 1-2 People |
The following article provides information for authors about choosing between a systematic and scoping review:
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
- Systematic Review GuideFor more information about systematic reviews, refer to the UNC HSL Systematic Review Guide.
A Simplified Process Map
- UNC HSL's Scoping Review Process MapA PDF file of the HSL's Scoping Review Process Map.
How can the library help?
The average systematic review takes 1,168 hours to complete.¹
A librarian can help you speed up the process.
The methodology for scoping reviews is similar to systematic reviews. While there are some differences, they still require significant time and resources to complete. Scoping reviews follow established guidelines and best practices to produce high-quality research. Librarian involvement in scoping reviews is based on two levels. In Tier 1, the librarian will collaborate with researchers in a consultative manner. In Tier 2, the librarian will be an active member of your research team and co-author on your review. Roles and expectations of librarians vary based on the level of involvement desired. Examples of these differences are outlined in the table below.
| Role | Tasks | Tier 1: Consultative | Tier 2: Research Partner / Co-author |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic Development | Guidance on process and steps | Yes | Yes |
| Background searching for past and upcoming reviews | Yes | Yes | |
| Development of Eligibility Criteria | Development and/or refinement of review topic | Yes | Yes |
| Assistance with refinement of PICO (population, intervention(s), comparator(s), and key questions | Yes | Yes | |
| Guidance on study types to include | Yes | Yes | |
| Protocol Creation and Registration | Guidance on protocol registration | Yes | Yes |
| Searching | Identification of databases for searches | Yes | Yes |
| Instruction in search techniques and methods | Yes | Yes | |
| Training in citation management software use for managing and sharing results | Yes | Yes | |
| Development and execution of searches | No | Yes | |
| Downloading search results to citation management software and removing duplicates | No | Yes | |
| Documentation of search strategies | No | Yes | |
| Management of search results | No | Yes | |
| Study Selection and Extraction (Charting) | Guidance on methods | Yes | Yes |
| Guidance on data extraction (charting), and management techniques and software | Yes | Yes | |
| Writing and Publishing | Suggestions of journals to target for publication | Yes | Yes |
| Drafting of literature search description in "Methods" section | No | Yes | |
| Creation of PRISMA diagram | No | Yes | |
| Drafting of literature search appendix | No | Yes | |
| Review other manuscript sections and final draft | No | Yes | |
| Librarian contributions warrant co-authorship | No | Yes |
Additional Resources
- Scoping studies: Towards a methodological frameworkArksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
- PRISMA Scoping Review GuidelinesThe PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was published in 2018. The checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items to include when completing a scoping review. Scoping reviews serve to synthesize evidence and assess the scope of literature on a topic. Among other objectives, scoping reviews help determine whether a systematic review of the literature is warranted.
- Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual, Chapter 11: Scoping ReviewsPeters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil, H. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews (2020 version). In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, JBI, 2020. Available from https://synthesismanual.jbi.global. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12
- Understanding scoping reviews: Definition, purpose, and processPeterson, F., Pearce, A., Ferguson, A., & Langford, A. (2017). Understanding scoping reviews: Definition, purpose, and process. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 29(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/2327-6924.12380
- A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviewsTricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Kastner, M., Levac, D., Ng, C., Sharpe, J. P., Wilson, K., Kenny, M., Warren, R., Wilson, C., Stelfox, H. T., & Straus, S. E. (2016). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4
- Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviewsPeters, M. D. , Godfrey, C. M. , Khalil, H. , McInerney, P. , Parker, D. & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13 (3), 141-146. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050.
Looking for our previous Systematic Review guide?
Our legacy guide was used June 2020 to August 2022
