Ready to start a systematic review? HSL Librarians can help!
Fill out the Systematic Review Request Form and the best-suited librarian will get back to you promptly. Our systematic review service is only available to faculty, staff, students, and others who are affiliated with UNC Chapel Hill.
While systematic reviews are well known, they may not be the best type of review for your research. Several tools are listed below to help you decide which type of review is best suited for your research.
"Review Methodologies Decision Tree" by Cornell University Library is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Although systematic reviews are one of the most well-known review types, there are a variety of different types of reviews that vary in terms of scope, comprehensiveness, time constraints, and types of studies included.
|Type of Review||Description||Time to Complete||Search Strategy||Other Information|
|Narrative/Literature Review||Collates relevant studies and draws conclusions from them.||2+ months||Search strategy not typically reported. Not comprehensive, which could introduce bias.||Collins JA, Fauser BC. Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11(2):103-104. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmh058|
|Scoping Review||Presents a preliminary assessment of the potential size and scope of available research literature. Aims to identify nature and extent of research evidence (usually including ongoing research).||2+ months||Completeness of searching determined by time/scope constraints. Librarian collaboration recommended.||
Arskey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J of Soc Research Meth: Theory and Prac. 2005; 8:1.
Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil, H. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews (2020 version). In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, JBI, 2020. Available from https://synthesismanual.jbi.global. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12
Joanna Briggs Institute - Scoping Review Network
Daudt HM, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:48. Published 2013 Mar 23. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-48
|Rapid Review||Assesses what is already known about a policy or practice issue by using systematic review methods to search and critically appraise existing research.||2-6+ months||Completeness of searching determined by time constraints. Librarian collaboration recommended.||
Khangura S, Konnyu K, Cushman R, Grimshaw J, Moher D. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev. 2012;1:10. Published 2012 Feb 10. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-10
|Integrative Review||Reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated.||2-10+ months||Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive search. Librarian collaboration recommended.||Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):546-553. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x|
|Umbrella Review||Reviews other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on a topic. Focuses on a broad condition or problem for which there are competing interventions and highlights reviews that address these interventions and their results.||2+ months||Identification of component reviews but no search for primary studies. Librarian collaboration recommended.||Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):15. Published 2011 Feb 3. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-15|
|Systematic Review||Attempts to identify, appraise, and synthesize all the empirical evidence that meets pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a given research question. Uses explicit methods aimed at minimizing bias in order to produce more reliable findings that can be used to inform decision making.||10-12+ months||Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive search. Librarian will develop search strategy and write methods section of manuscript.||Lodge M. Conducting a systematic review: finding the evidence. J Evid Based Med. 2011;4(2):135-139. doi:10.1111/j.1756-5391.2011.01130.x|
|Meta-Analysis||A statistical test that combines the results from multiple studies to answer one or more research questions||10-12+ months||Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive search. Librarian will develop search strategy and write methods section of manuscript.||Møller AM, Myles PS. What makes a good systematic review and meta-analysis?. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(4):428-430. doi:10.1093/bja/aew264|
More information on review types: